Scientific writing

Turns a research paper into an accurate plain-language summary, press release, blog post or social thread without hype, keeping caveats, study type and effect sizes. Use for science communication.

Drafts a point-by-point response to peer-review comments, giving the change made or a polite, evidenced rebuttal for each, never claiming unmade changes. Use for revise-and-resubmit.

Writes a structured or unstructured abstract within a word limit from a manuscript, keeping every number faithful to the source and showing where each appears. Use before submission.

Writes a research or grant proposal section (aims, significance, approach, timeline) mapped to the funder's criteria, with placeholders instead of invented data. Use for grant or thesis proposals.

Acts as an academic writing coach who helps researchers find their argument, build a regular writing habit and revise for clarity, while the ideas and the words stay theirs.

Standing rules for academic writing that hedge claims to the evidence, define terms, forbid invented citations, keep tense and terminology consistent, and report numbers precisely.

Judges whether a journal rejection is worth appealing, then writes a respectful appeal letter that corrects factual errors in the reviews with evidence, or recommends moving on.

Shortlists journals for a manuscript by scope, audience, article type, open-access costs and timelines, ranked in tiers, with facts to verify on each journal's site. For authors before submission.

Designs a conference poster with a headline finding, layout grid, condensed sections, figures to include and a 60-second walkthrough script. For researchers presenting at conferences.

Plans a paper's figures, choosing which results become figures, chart types, panels, labels, colour and accessibility, and writes self-contained captions. For authors preparing a manuscript.

Converts references to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE or Vancouver, flags missing fields instead of inventing them, and fixes the matching in-text citations. For students and researchers.

Takes a research grant from funder fit to aims, approach, budget justification and a mock review with revisions, pausing for approval between steps. For researchers applying for funding.

Takes a manuscript from target journal and outline through methods and results, introduction and discussion, title and abstract, and a pre-submission check, pausing for approval between steps.

Plans how to share research findings with each audience, choosing outputs, channels, messengers and timing, and how to tell whether the findings reached and were used.

Plans a short research talk for a conference or lab meeting with a one-sentence message, timed slide sequence, figure choices, opening and close, and Q&A preparation. For researchers presenting work.

Plans a thesis or dissertation structure with each chapter's purpose, the argument flow, word budgets and a writing timeline working back from the deadline. For graduate students.

Writes a concise request to a paper's authors for data, code or missing results, stating purpose, intended use, data protection commitments and credit, with a polite follow-up.

Acts as a science communicator who makes research vivid and accurate, uses analogies carefully, keeps uncertainty visible and never overstates findings. For researchers, journalists and educators.

Acts as a thesis advisor who sharpens the research question, keeps scope realistic, pushes for a clear contribution and sets milestones, with direct, supportive feedback. For graduate students.

Takes a master's or doctoral thesis from proposal through plan, chapter cycles and whole-thesis revision to defence preparation, in gated steps with a supervisor checkpoint at each.

Plans how to turn a thesis chapter into a journal article, deciding the paper's single message, what to cut, how to reframe for a journal audience, and the fit with a target journal.

Writes a paper or thesis discussion covering principal findings, comparison with prior work, mechanisms, limitations, implications and future work, matching claims to the evidence. For authors.

Writes a research impact statement or pathway to impact naming beneficiaries, the mechanisms that reach them, activities, indicators and evidence, matched to the funder's or assessment's format.

Writes a manuscript introduction that moves from the field to the gap to the study's aim using the CARS model, citing only supplied sources and using placeholders instead of invented references.

Writes a manuscript submission cover letter stating the contribution, the fit with the journal's scope and the required declarations, in one page an editor can act on. For authors submitting papers.

Writes a manuscript methods section another researcher could replicate, following the relevant reporting guideline and flagging every missing detail. For authors drafting a paper or thesis.

Writes journal highlights, a graphical abstract concept and a plain-language summary for an accepted or submitted paper, within the journal's limits and true to the results.

Turns research findings into a policy brief for decision-makers with the problem, the evidence and its strength, costed options and recommendations. For researchers and think tanks.

Writes a manuscript results section that reports findings in a logical order with exact statistics, effect sizes, confidence intervals and figure references, and no interpretation.